Categories

Newsletter archives

KT launches Korea’s First 3D BMS

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

KT has announced on the 13th that it has commercialized Korea’s first 3D Building Management System (BMS) in collaboration with KSIC (Korea Spatial Information & Communication, a SME specializing in SW).

This 3D BMS project can be called “Smart Building,” one of KT’s S.M.ART 6 sectors. As mentioned in recent posts, SMART is one of the three integrative B2B strategy that KT, LGT, and SKT had set out, in order to step beyond its saturated Telco market. (The other sectors of ‘Smart 6′ include Smart Enterprise, Smart SOHO/SMB, Smart Government, Smart Zone, and Smart Green.)

 
‘KT Smart Tower’ control room, operating agents working with the 3D BMS

The BMS is computer-based maintenance system that controls and monitors the building’s mechanical and electrical equipment, which is a critical component in managing the building’s energy demand. With the help of KSIC, the gathered database of a building facility is turned into a 3D GIS(Geographic Information System). Now with real-time 3D video feeds of the building facilities, building managers can more effectively maintain the building throughout its lifecycle.

With 3D BMs, not only is real-time monitoring of individual facilities possible, but the wiring and plumbing system, which are not usually visible to the naked eye, can also be identified. Hence, immediate detection and correction of problems will be made possible, which can efficiently reduce accidents and safety hazards that occur within building facilities.

Currently, the 3D BMS solution is being tested in KT’s Smart Tower, a 12 storey building with 5 basement floors located in Gwacheon, Kyunggi-do, which is also apart of KT’s smart building business.
KT is planning to set out its BIM solution as the flagship of the smart building business future, with the IT-Construction synergy effect between Korea’s U-city business (building cities managed entirely by IT infrastructure) and the Smart BMS business.

Moreover, the Korean government has recently been promoting to further the 3D BMS solution into preempting the market in Building Information Modeling (BIM) for public buildings. BIM is a process that involves generating and managing real-time, three-dimensional building modeling data to increase productivity in building design and construction. However, there are yet to be buildings based on BIM solutions in Korea for now.



  • Share/Bookmark

SKT Stands up Against iPhone

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

Since the official release of the iPhone last year November 28th, with sole custody by KT, SKT and LGT has been very aware of the consequences Apple is going to bring to Korea’s telco industry. Reaching 100,000 in iPhone subscribers within the first month of its release(continued to 500,000 in 4 months), the iPhone has certainly been KT’s miracle drug who had only accumulated 20,000~30,000 for the past two years. However while KT has been quite laid back with its taste of victory, SKT(dominant in Korea with over 50% of mobile market shares) has been vigorously pursing strategies to stand up against the iPhone. LGT has its own strategies, but is happening to be lagging with a weak line up of new smartphones  just as KT is, without its bread winning iPhone.

KT
KT has been tasting the fruits of its, well, heavy “investment” for monopoly over the iPhone supply in Korea. However, recently they have also been facing a curb in number of smartphone models obtained from Samsung. It is no secret that Samsung has expressed its disregards towards the entry of iPhone into the Korea (of course we cannot simply draw an induction with these two parallels).
Moreover, though KT has been believed to be stepping ahead with release of other Wi-Fi-enabled smartphones in the market, it has only three smartphone line ups consisting of Nokia X6, LGE’s Android phone, Pantech.

LGT
LGT has not been so hot either. Though it has always ranked 3rd amongst the 3 telcos in Korea, its new ‘Integrative LGT’ project’s communication system has made it the incompatible to foreign manufactured smartphones. Like KT, its number of line ups has been limited to two, the Eclipse phone and Samsung’s Android phone.

SKT’s forthcoming smartphones are △ Samsung’s ‘Galaxy A’, ‘Galaxy S’ △ HTC’s ‘Designer’, ‘HD2′ △ Sony Ericsson’s ‘Xperia X10′ △ Motorola’s ‘droid’, ‘XT800W’ △ Pantech’s ‘Sirius’ △ Research In Motion’s (RIM)  ‘BlackBerry Bold 9700′ △ LG Electronics ‘SU950′, 10 species in total.

SKT
SKT on the other hand, has been on fire with its plans to release 10 kinds of new smartphone in the second quarter. This is astonishing compared to the 13 models it has released over the past 5 years. It is basing most its models on the Android OS, with it grand trophy phone, the Galaxy S (of which SKT has sole supply rights) releasing hopefully this June. Its high utility with acute telecommunication openness and portability, has given it high expectations to be most competitive against the iPhone in Korea. Its further announcement in April 14th to go all-out open WiFi is likely to bring an inevitable showdown with KT.

The arrival of iPhone has certainly made its waves in Korea’s telco market. However, there is certainly more yet to be seen of what will become of the three telcos – KT, LGT and SKT – of Korea.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Politics of WiFi in Korea

Monday, May 24th, 2010


Amongst the 3W mobile networks available in Korea - WCDMA, WiBro, and WiFi - WiFi had not been receiving much attention from the mobile business circles. However, since the inception of iPhone and the following smartphones, WiFi has become the critical resource of competitive advantage for mobile network operators to serve their smartphone users. In particular, the WiFi became one of the most conflictual policy issues for Korea’s local government election coming up early this June. Concerned with earning the favor and votes of the public, politicians have been insisting on the free use of WiFi in public places. However, each related stakeholder clearly has different perspective on this matter.

Policy makers are insisting on making WiFi a free public network to improve the benefits of public interests. They asserted that free mobile network infrastructure is necessary to boost the use of smartphones. Further regarding the investment costs for the policy makers, WiFi has the most appropriate budget option compared with other W networks.

The industry on the other hand showed different reactions. KT, who has already made substantial investments on WiFi coverage throughout the nation, strictly disagreed with the free use of WiFi. KT strongly asserted that it will discourage investment on mobile network from private sectors and also that WiFi has great deal of security issues, which should be dealt by expert operators rather than local government. They instead suggested that the vitalization of smartphone usage can be achieved through inexpensive price plans. However, SKT conversely insisted that local government should cooperate with telcos in its use within certain public areas and facilities, like the case with street lights, in order to avoid overlapping investments.

Lastly, the KCC (Korea Communication Committee) emphasized their policy principle that government’s role should lie in promoting, rather than creating, an efficient market. In other words, WiFi should be built based on market competition rather than by local government’s sole initiative. But they partially accepted the open use of WiFi network in cases with public benefits such as education or accident prevention. 

Telecommunication infrastructure should serve to benefit the public by its nature. However, by over-emphasizing on public benefits, the private sector will likely lose their motivations for making investment. WiFi will play a critical role for the future mobile internet ecosystem, especially concerning the spread of smart devices like smartphones. Hence, the policy on WiFi should not be decided based on politicians’ own interests. Rather, it should be by balancing between market mechanism and public benefits, and vigorously evaluated the feasibility of execution for each action.  

  • Share/Bookmark