<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WiBro - Will it work as promised?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.koreaninsight.com/2008/11/wibro-will-it-work-as-promised/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.koreaninsight.com/2008/11/wibro-will-it-work-as-promised/</link>
	<description>Fresh Implications and Insights from Korea's Technology/Digital Sector</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.koreaninsight.com/2008/11/wibro-will-it-work-as-promised/#comment-29656</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.koreaninsight.com/?p=157#comment-29656</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Annuaire. I see that you are from France. Please feel free to share my articles anywhere on the Web in France. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Annuaire. I see that you are from France. Please feel free to share my articles anywhere on the Web in France. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annuaire gratuit</title>
		<link>http://www.koreaninsight.com/2008/11/wibro-will-it-work-as-promised/#comment-28744</link>
		<dc:creator>Annuaire gratuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.koreaninsight.com/?p=157#comment-28744</guid>
		<description>Hello I know,that your blog is very Interesting and i'm very happy to be here with you ! My passion, is internet and technology. I have just put on my Internet to search some actuality and i arrived on your site. Thank you for your article, I am going to share it with my friends and come back soon. I am impressed by the quality of your post and of the information you bring me. It shows as you manage the information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello I know,that your blog is very Interesting and i&#8217;m very happy to be here with you ! My passion, is internet and technology. I have just put on my Internet to search some actuality and i arrived on your site. Thank you for your article, I am going to share it with my friends and come back soon. I am impressed by the quality of your post and of the information you bring me. It shows as you manage the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yunho</title>
		<link>http://www.koreaninsight.com/2008/11/wibro-will-it-work-as-promised/#comment-4035</link>
		<dc:creator>yunho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.koreaninsight.com/?p=157#comment-4035</guid>
		<description>good point Max. I think not having the Killer Application or Killer Service excuslively for Wibro can be the most big mistake. And also too many competiting alternatives in Korea can also be the reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good point Max. I think not having the Killer Application or Killer Service excuslively for Wibro can be the most big mistake. And also too many competiting alternatives in Korea can also be the reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://www.koreaninsight.com/2008/11/wibro-will-it-work-as-promised/#comment-4034</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.koreaninsight.com/?p=157#comment-4034</guid>
		<description>Maybe they should had have given out wi-bro modems for free or prepare a list of interesting services and content, like NTTDoCoMo did with i-mode.
I believe the big mistake is done with the coverage. If Wi-Bro itself is intended to cover more territory why the signal level indoors is low? And why did not they start the service outside metropolitan area? At least they would have gather a bunch of subscribers through which they could test and promote, and move to cities after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they should had have given out wi-bro modems for free or prepare a list of interesting services and content, like NTTDoCoMo did with i-mode.<br />
I believe the big mistake is done with the coverage. If Wi-Bro itself is intended to cover more territory why the signal level indoors is low? And why did not they start the service outside metropolitan area? At least they would have gather a bunch of subscribers through which they could test and promote, and move to cities after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
